I have made Bash scripts before <em>a<em>nem>dem> they all ra<em>nem> fi<em>nem>e without #!/bi<em>nem>/bash at the begi<em>nem><em>nem>i<em>nem>g. 9 A<em>nem>swers ...

... the i<em>nem>vocatio<em>nem> to this: taskkill /im "test.exe" /f &gt;<em>nem>ul 2&gt;&amp;1 <em>a<em>nem>dem> all will be better. That works because stdout is file descriptor 1, <em>a<em>nem>dem> stderr is file descriptor 2 by co<em>nem>ve<em>nem>tio<em>nem>. (0 is stdi<em>nem>, i<em>nem>cide<em>nem>tally.) The 2&gt;&amp;1 copies output file descriptor 2 from the <em>nem>ew value of 1, whic...

...<em>nem>ts), but for my purp<em>osem>es (a drawi<em>nem>g applicatio<em>nem>), it's good e<em>nem>ough for me <em>a<em>nem>dem> visually you ca<em>nem>'t tell the differe<em>nem>ce. There is a solutio<em>nem> to go through all the sample poi<em>nem>ts, but it is much more complicated (see http://www.cartogrammar.com/blog/actio<em>nem>script-curves-update/) Here is the the drawi<em>nem>g...

....gitig<em>nem>ore file should be i<em>nem> your rep<em>osem>itory, so it should i<em>nem>deed be added <em>a<em>nem>dem> committed i<em>nem>, as git status suggests. It has to be a part of the rep<em>osem>itory tree, so that cha<em>nem>ges to it ca<em>nem> be merged <em>a<em>nem>dem> so o<em>nem>. So, add it to your rep<em>osem>itory, it should <em>nem>ot be gitig<em>nem>ored. If you really wa<em>nem>t you ca<em>nem> add...

I have a webapp o<em>nem> a <em>Nem>Gi<em>nem>x server. I set gzip o<em>nem> i<em>nem> the co<em>nem>f file <em>a<em>nem>dem> <em>nem>ow I'm tryi<em>nem>g to see if it works. YSlow says it's <em>nem>ot, but 5 out of 6 websites that do the test say it is. How ca<em>nem> I get a defi<em>nem>ite a<em>nem>swer o<em>nem> this <em>a<em>nem>dem> why is there a differe<em>nem>ce i<em>nem> the results? ...

... is 1500 bytes. Some types of <em>nem>etworks (like Toke<em>nem> Ri<em>nem>g) have larger MTUs, <em>a<em>nem>dem> some types have smaller MTUs, but the values are fixed for each physical tech<em>nem>ology. share | improve this a<em>nem>swer ...

... List&lt;Object&gt;(); Eve<em>nem> better: si<em>nem>ce it's a field, make it private. <em>A<em>nem>dem> if there's <em>nem>othi<em>nem>g preve<em>nem>ti<em>nem>g you, make it also reado<em>nem>ly. Just good practice. Aside The correct way to check for <em>nem>ullity is if(data != <em>nem>ull). This ki<em>nem>d of check is ubiquitous for refere<em>nem>ce types; eve<em>nem> <em>Nem>ullable&lt;T&gt; ...

... From http://developer.<em>a<em>nem>dem>roid.com/refere<em>nem>ce/<em>a<em>nem>dem>roid/app/Activity.html public fi<em>nem>al void showDialog (i<em>nem>t id) Added i<em>nem> API level 1 This method was deprecated i<em>nem> API level 13. Use the <em>nem>ew DialogFragme<em>nem>t class with Fragme<em>nem>tMa<em>nem>ager i<em>nem>stead; ...

I am ru<em>nem><em>nem>i<em>nem>g a<em>nem> applicatio<em>nem> through gdb <em>a<em>nem>dem> I wa<em>nem>t to set a breakpoi<em>nem>t for a<em>nem>y time a specific variable is accessed / cha<em>nem>ged. Is there a good method for doi<em>nem>g this? I would also be i<em>nem>terested i<em>nem> other ways to mo<em>nem>itor a variable i<em>nem> C/C++ to see if/whe<em>nem> it cha<em>nem>ges. ...

...ice that the above is <em>nem>ot exceptio<em>nem> safe. If a<em>nem>ythi<em>nem>g betwee<em>nem> the <em>nem>ew call <em>a<em>nem>dem> the delete call throws, you will leak memory, as <em>nem>othi<em>nem>g will call delete for you automatically. There are two immediate ways to solve this. bo<em>osem>t::scoped_array bo<em>osem>t::scoped_array will delete the memory for you upo<em>nem> go...