... someAttr) { } You ca<em>nem> eve<em>nem> omit @RequestParam altogether if you cho<em>osem>e, <em>a<em>nem>dem> Spri<em>nem>g will assume that's what it is: @RequestMappi<em>nem>g("/{someID}") public @Respo<em>nem>seBody i<em>nem>t getAttr(@PathVariable(value="someID") Stri<em>nem>g id, Stri<em>nem>g someAttr) { } ...

...e reverted files i<em>nem> the stagi<em>nem>g area. From there, I'd perform a soft reset <em>a<em>nem>dem> add i<em>nem> the cha<em>nem>ges I really wa<em>nem>ted. For a<em>nem> example workflow: git revert &lt;sha-of-bad-commit&gt; --<em>nem>o-commit git reset // This gets them out of the stagi<em>nem>g area &lt;edit bad file to look like it should, if <em>nem>ecessary&g...

... as %25. The way you get %2520 is whe<em>nem> your url already has a %20 i<em>nem> it, <em>a<em>nem>dem> gets urle<em>nem>coded agai<em>nem>, which tra<em>nem>sforms the %20 to %2520. Are you (or a<em>nem>y framework you might be usi<em>nem>g) double e<em>nem>codi<em>nem>g characters? Edit: Exp<em>a<em>nem>dem>i<em>nem>g a bit o<em>nem> this, especially for LOCAL li<em>nem>ks. Assumi<em>nem>g you wa<em>nem>t to li<em>nem>k t...

I'm ki<em>nem>d of <em>nem>ew to webapps <em>a<em>nem>dem> database stuff i<em>nem> ge<em>nem>eral so this might be a dumb questio<em>nem>. I wa<em>nem>t to make a model ("CategoryModel") with a field that poi<em>nem>ts to the primary id of a<em>nem>other i<em>nem>sta<em>nem>ce of the model (its pare<em>nem>t). ...

... 1) There are ma<em>nem>y examples o<em>nem> the I<em>nem>ter<em>nem>et <em>a<em>nem>dem> o<em>nem> StackOverflow about the particular issue with ge<em>nem>erics <em>a<em>nem>dem> varargs. Basically, it's whe<em>nem> you have a variable <em>nem>umber of argume<em>nem>ts of a type-parameter type: &lt;T&gt; void foo(T... args); I<em>nem> Java, varargs are a sy<em>nem>tac...

... Just trial <em>a<em>nem>dem> error really after tryi<em>nem>g everythi<em>nem>g I could thi<em>nem>k of to trick it i<em>nem>to worki<em>nem>g :) – Matt Wilso<em>nem> Mar 10 '14 at 21:20 ...

I<em>nem> R, I have a<em>nem> eleme<em>nem>t x <em>a<em>nem>dem> a vector v . I wa<em>nem>t to fi<em>nem>d the first i<em>nem>dex of a<em>nem> eleme<em>nem>t i<em>nem> v that is equal to x . I k<em>nem>ow that o<em>nem>e way to do this is: which(x == v)[[1]] , but that seems excessively i<em>nem>efficie<em>nem>t. Is there a more direct way to do it? ...

... the mome<em>nem>t the @P<em>osem>tCo<em>nem>struct ru<em>nem>s. I<em>nem> JSF 2.0/2.1, this tag did<em>nem>'t exist <em>a<em>nem>dem> you have to use the preRe<em>nem>derView workarou<em>nem>d. If the backi<em>nem>g bea<em>nem> is @RequestScoped, do they effectively do the exact same thi<em>nem>g? (<em>a<em>nem>dem> so the<em>nem> it is up to developer choice? (@P<em>osem>tCo<em>nem>struct seems "clea<em>nem>er"). <em>Nem>o, they do ...

...y to upload a file to my bucket. I have set the ACL to public-read-write <em>a<em>nem>dem> it works fi<em>nem>e but the file is still private. ...

...) would work. However there is a big differe<em>nem>ce betwee<em>nem> has_ma<em>nem>y relatio<em>nem>s <em>a<em>nem>dem> has_o<em>nem>e relatio<em>nem>s: With a has_ma<em>nem>y relatio<em>nem>, shops retur<em>nem>s a<em>nem> ActiveRecord collectio<em>nem> object, which has methods that you ca<em>nem> use to add <em>a<em>nem>dem> remove shops to/from a user. O<em>nem>e of th<em>osem>e methods is create, which creates a <em>nem>ew...