大约有 43,000 项符合查询结果（耗时：0.0178秒） [XML]
How to pick just one item from a generator?
...ption if necessary, or use the default argument to next():
next(g, default_value)
share
|
improve this answer
|
follow
|
...
Why is Python running my module when I import it, and how do I stop it?
...is:
# stuff to run always here such as class/def
def main():
pass
if __name__ == "__main__":
# stuff only to run when not called via 'import' here
main()
See What is if __name__ == "__main__" for?
It does require source control over the module being imported, however.
Happy coding.
...
Should I use 'has_key()' or 'in' on Python dicts?
...
in is definitely more pythonic.
In fact has_key() was removed in Python 3.x.
share
|
improve this answer
|
follow
|
...
Asynchronous method call in Python?
...an use pools of processes and then get results asynchronously with:
apply_async(func[, args[, kwds[, callback]]])
E.g.:
from multiprocessing import Pool
def f(x):
return x*x
if __name__ == '__main__':
pool = Pool(processes=1) # Start a worker processes.
result = pool....
Average of 3 long integers
...ng divide by constants technique from hacker's delight
public class int128_t {
private int H;
private long L;
public int128_t(int h, long l)
{
H = h;
L = l;
}
public int128_t add(int128_t a)
{
int128_t s;
s.L = L + a.L;
s.H = H +...
Get last result in interactive Python shell
...
Underscore.
>>> 5+5
10
>>> _
10
>>> _ + 5
15
>>> _
15
share
|
improve this answer
|
follow
|...
How to log a method's execution time exactly in milliseconds?
...
I just compared NSDate and mach_absolute_time() at around 30ms level. 27 vs. 29, 36 vs. 39, 43 vs. 45. NSDate was easier to use for me and the results were similar enough not to bother with mach_absolute_time().
– nevan king
...
How to merge lists into a list of tuples?
...
In Python 2:
>>> list_a = [1, 2, 3, 4]
>>> list_b = [5, 6, 7, 8]
>>> zip(list_a, list_b)
[(1, 5), (2, 6), (3, 7), (4, 8)]
In Python 3:
>>> list_a = [1, 2, 3, 4]
>>> list_b = [5, 6, 7, 8]
>>> list(zi...
How to add an integer to each element in a list?
...
new_list = [x+1 for x in my_list]
share
|
improve this answer
|
follow
|
...
Is gcc 4.8 or earlier buggy about regular expressions?
....
Seriously though, who though that shipping an implementation of regex_search that only does "return false" was a good idea?
It wasn't such a bad idea a few years ago, when C++0x was still a work in progress and we shipped lots of partial implementations. No-one thought it would remain unusab...