...'t work (i.e. forward declaration) Edit: Corrected wrong assumption about C99 struct declaration, as rightfully remarked by Jonathan Leffler. Edit 2018-06-01: Craig Barnes reminds us in his comment that you don't need to keep separate names for the struct "tag" name and its "typedef" name, like I di...

... answered Nov 20 '13 at 19:56 dg99dg99 4,52011 gold badge3232 silver badges4949 bronze badges ...

...d before the first executable statement (this feature has been dropped in C99. C99 and latter allow mixed type declarations.) Semantics is about the meaning of the sentence. It answers the questions: is this sentence valid? If so, what does the sentence mean? For example: x++; //...

... regdougregdoug 94388 silver badges99 bronze badges 5 ...

...r linked above returns whole numbers when it rounds to one, so for example 99.004 will return 99 instead of 99.00 which isn't ideal for displaying prices. Edit 3 - Seems having the toFixed on the actual return was STILL screwing up some numbers, this final edit appears to work. Geez so many reworks!...

... Bruno BronoskyBruno Bronosky 49.3k99 gold badges122122 silver badges111111 bronze badges ...

... Elias Van OotegemElias Van Ootegem 65.5k99 gold badges9393 silver badges136136 bronze badges ...

... From Wikipedia: According to the 1999 ISO C standard (C99), size_t is an unsigned integer type of at least 16 bit (see sections 7.17 and 7.18.3). size_tis an unsigned data type defined by several C/C++ standards, e.g. the C99 ISO/IEC 9899 stand...

...y thinks that 79 is optimal, but there's no obvious gain in changing it to 99 or 119 or whatever your preferred line length is. I think the choices are these: follow the rule and find a worthwhile cause to battle for, or provide some data that demonstrates how readability and productivity vary with ...

... Peter BaileyPeter Bailey 99.9k2828 gold badges174174 silver badges198198 bronze badges ...