I tend to declare as static all the methods in a class when that class doesn't require to keep track of internal states. For example, if I need to transform A into B and don't rely on some internal state C that may vary, I create a static transform. If there is an internal state C that I want to be ...

... actual device screen Same goes for max-height and max-device-height naturally. share | improve this answer | follow | ...

...t to to do it beforehand, if you just add the line to the .gitignore file, all previously committed .pyc files will still be tracked, so you'll need to remove them from the repository. If you are on a Linux system (or "parents&sons" like a MacOSX), you can quickly do it with just this one line ...

...h can be modified Any method which accepts a CharSequence can operate on all of these equally well. Any method which only accepts a String will require conversion. So using CharSequence as an argument type in all the places where you don't care about the internals is prudent. However you should us...

...ate a near 100% load on a Linux machine. It's quad core system and I want all cores going full speed. Ideally, the CPU load would last a designated amount of time and then stop. I'm hoping there's some trick in bash. I'm thinking some sort of infinite loop. ...

... it. Of those, I think Twitter's matador is structured pretty well. We actually used a very similar approach to how they load up parts of the app. derby.js also looks extremely interesting. It's akin to meteor without all of the hype and actually gives credit where credit is due (notably, node and e...

..., but also cause tests to run slower than necessary. API. Espresso has a small, well-defined and predictable API, which is open to customization. You tell the framework how to locate a UI element using standard hamcrest matchers and then instruct it to either perform an action or check an assertion ...

... Any fields not specified should receive their default value (which is usually NULL when not defined). share | improve this answer | follow | ...

...of why and what you can do instead can be found here. The reasons are basically that it's a performance hack that tends to cause more problems later down the line as your data changes, whereas PostgreSQL's optimizer can re-evaluate the plan based on the statistics. In other words, what might be a go...

... Since Dave asked for me to repeat my answer to Omitting all xsi and xsd namespaces when serializing an object in .NET, I have updated this post and repeated my answer here from the afore-mentioned link. The example used in this answer is the same example used for the other questio...