Is it legitimate to use items() instead of iteritems() in all places? Why was iteritems() removed from Python 3? Seems like a terrific and useful method. What's the reasoning behind it? ...

... git pull code $ rm -rf code/code $ rm -rf code/.git $ git pull figures --allow-unrelated-histories $ rm -rf figures/figures $ rm -rf figures/.git $ git pull thesis --allow-unrelated-histories $ rm -rf thesis/thesis $ rm -rf thesis/.git Finally, you should now have what you wanted: phd |_.git...

It seems they canceled in Python 3 all the easy way to quickly load a script by removing execfile() 12 Answers ...

...robust code that can access the subdirectory regardless of where it is installed on the user's system. 6 Answers ...

... I'm sorry, but this answer is quite incorrect on all accounts and doesn't even answer the question. – rubenvb Jan 27 '15 at 20:13 ...

... answered Dec 31 '09 at 1:21 jballjball 23.1k88 gold badges6464 silver badges9191 bronze badges ...

...ink I still have something else to add. Reasons to have that if statement calling main() (in no particular order): Other languages (like C and Java) have a main() function that is called when the program is executed. Using this if, we can make Python behave like them, which feels more familiar for ...

... load into your own projects. Easy to use, high performance tools for parallel computing. Note that the first 2 lines tell you it helps you make the most of using Python. Thus, you don't need to alter your code, the IPython shell runs your python code just like the normal python shell does, o...

...ficient in term of memory/speed from what I've seen (not measured though). All three methods will throw an uninitialized constant error when ROOT_DIR is nil. When dealing with pathnames, you may want to use File.join to avoid messing up with pathname separator. In the end, it is a matter of taste....

I was wondering if there's any library for asynchronous method calls in Python . It would be great if you could do something like ...