大约有 40,700 项符合查询结果（耗时：0.0373秒） [XML]
windows service vs scheduled task
...
Update:
Nearly four years after my original answer and this answer is very out of date. Since TopShelf came along Windows Services development got easy. Now you just need to figure out how to support failover...
Original Answer:
I'm really not a fan of Windows Scheduler. The user...
Python: Why is functools.partial necessary?
Partial application is cool. What functionality does functools.partial offer that you can't get through lambdas?
6 Answer...
How to calculate date difference in JavaScript?
I want to calculate date difference in days, hours, minutes, seconds, milliseconds, nanoseconds. How can I do it?
18 Answer...
How can I determine what font a browser is actually using to render some text?
...Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; " for the whole page. It looks like Verdana is being used instead on some parts. I would like to be able to verify this.
...
How many Activities vs Fragments?
The basic "Fragments Tutorial" pattern goes something like this:
5 Answers
5
...
Can I set an unlimited length for maxJsonLength in web.config?
I am using the autocomplete feature of jQuery. When I try to retrieve the list of more then 17000 records (each won't have more than 10 char length), it's exceeding the length and throws the error:
...
Centering a div block without the width
...ted up, but now I normally use @bobince's approach instead.
.child { /* This is the item to center... */
display: inline-block;
}
.parent { /* ...and this is its parent container. */
text-align: center;
}
My original post for historical purposes:
You might want to try this approach.
<div...
MySQL connection not working: 2002 No such file or directory
...
If you use Linux: the path to the mysql.sock file is wrong. This is usually because you are using (LAMPP) XAMPP and it isn't in /tmp/mysql.sock
Open the php.ini file and find this line:
mysql.default_socket
And make it
mysql.default_socket = /path/to/mysql.sock
...
Single quotes vs. double quotes in Python [closed]
According to the documentation, they're pretty much interchangeable. Is there a stylistic reason to use one over the other?
...
Constant pointer vs Pointer to constant [duplicate]
... right
ptr++; // wrong
Generally I would prefer the declaration like this which make it easy to read and understand (read from right to left):
int const *ptr; // ptr is a pointer to constant int
int *const ptr; // ptr is a constant pointer to int
...