大约有 4,600 项符合查询结果（耗时：0.0315秒） [XML]
Equation for testing if a point is inside a circle
...)%1000; yo = rand()%1000; R = 1;
int n = 0;
int c;
for (c=0; c<N; c++){
x = rand()%1000; y = rand()%1000;
// if ( inCircle(x,y) ){
if ( inCircleN(x,y) ){
// if ( dummy(x,y) ){
n++;
}
}
printf( "%d of %d inside circle\n", n, N);
}
...
Weird “[]” after Java method signature
...point out that a similar (but not identical) notation is possible in C and C++:
Here the function f returns a pointer to an array of 10 ints.
int tab[10];
int (*f())[10]
{
return &tab;
}
Java simply doesn't need the star and parenthesis.
...
Qt: How do I handle the event of the user pressing the 'X' (close) button?
...
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged c++ qt or ask your own question.
Why should I avoid std::enable_if in function signatures
Scott Meyers posted content and status of his next book EC++11.
He wrote that one item in the book could be "Avoid std::enable_if in function signatures" .
...
Can I call an overloaded constructor from another constructor of the same class in C#?
... could do this with a common initialization function (like you would do in C++ which doesn't support ctor chaining)
class A
{
//ctor chaining
public A() : this(0)
{
Console.WriteLine("default ctor");
}
public A(int i)
{
Init(i);
}
// what you want
public A(stri...
How to sort with a lambda?
...en BTR? Btw. you can use std::begin(vec) and std::end(vec) to make it more c++11.
– Logman
Nov 8 '17 at 12:33
Sorry, I...
Interface defining a constructor signature?
...
It reminds me of c++ multiple inheritence problem without virtual inheritance
– prabhakaran
Mar 4 '14 at 5:47
...
Most efficient method to groupby on an array of objects
...
It takes a bit to get used to, but so do most of C++ templates as well
– Levi Haskell
Jan 22 '19 at 15:21
...
Subclassing a Java Builder class
...
Ah, I didn't know that, as I come from a C++ background. That's a useful approach for this small example, but with a full-blown class repeating all the methods becomes a pain, and an error-prone pain at that. +1 for teaching me something new, however!
...
_DEBUG vs NDEBUG
...?
Yes it is a standard macro with the semantic "Not Debug" for C89, C99, C++98, C++2003, C++2011, C++2014 standards. There are no _DEBUG macros in the standards.
C++2003 standard send the reader at "page 326" at "17.4.2.1 Headers"
to standard C.
That NDEBUG is similar as This is the same as ...