大约有 14,100 项符合查询结果（耗时：0.0309秒） [XML]
Moving decimal places over in a double
...
If you use double or float, you should use rounding or expect to see some rounding errors. If you can't do this, use BigDecimal.
The problem you have is that 0.1 is not an exact representation, and by performing the calculation twice, you are compounding that error.
However, 100...
What is “Argument-Dependent Lookup” (aka ADL, or “Koenig Lookup”)?
What are some good explanations on what argument dependent lookup is? Many people also call it Koenig Lookup as well.
4 Ans...
There is no ListBox.SelectionMode=“None”, is there another way to disable selection in a listbox?
How do I disable selection in a ListBox?
16 Answers
16
...
C default arguments
...e lack of checking when using varargs.
– dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten
Sep 24 '09 at 15:03
16
As...
Define all functions in one .R file, call them from another .R file. How, if possible?
How do I call functions defined in abc.R file in another file, say xyz.R?
1 Answer
1
...
How can I remove a trailing newline?
...ly removes the input record separator from the end. That's a newline on Unixy things, but may be different (e.g. Windows) and it's mutable. Is there a way to remove that value only once from the end of a string?
– brian d foy
Nov 8 '08 at 21:04
...
Error to install Nokogiri on OSX 10.9 Maverick?
I upgraded my OSX (Lion) to Mavericks and I can't install Nokogiri for my projects.
30 Answers
...
Add SUM of values of two LISTS into new LIST
...
The zip function is useful here, used with a list comprehension.
[x + y for x, y in zip(first, second)]
If you have a list of lists (instead of just two lists):
lists_of_lists = [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]
[sum(x) for x in zip(*lists_of_lists)]
# -> [5, 7, 9]
...
What is a simple/minimal browserconfig.xml for a web site
...on't want to see the 404 Not Found messages as IE looks for browserconfig.xml scrolling by in my log files.
6 Answers
...
Why do objects of the same class have access to each other's private data?
... meaningful per-object access control at compile time". Why not? In void X::f(X&x), the compiler is easily capable of distinguishing this->a and x.a. It's not (always) possible for the compiler to know that *this and x are actually the same object if x.f(x) is invoked, but I could very well...