... Also WebClient doesn't have timeout property. And that's the problem, because dafault value is 100 seconds and that's too much to indicate if there's no Internet connection. Workaround for that problem is here https://stackoverflow.com/a/3...

...ble as a parameter is that it tells callers "I wish to enumerate this". It doesn't tell them how many times you wish to enumerate. I can change the objects parameter to be List and then avoid the possible multiple enumeration but then I don't get the highest object that I can handle. The goal...

...this would perform on a large table? Is it just changing some metadata, or does it actually have to reorganize data on the disk? – Kip Nov 12 '15 at 16:01 7 ...

...ad recursive call. Typically, this is caused when your recursive functions doesn't have the correct termination condition, so it ends up calling itself forever. Or when the termination condition is fine, it can be caused by requiring too many recursive calls before fulfilling it. However, with GUI ...

... Vim is not a shell. And it does not communicate well with subprocesses. This is nearly by design, whereas in Emacs, these elements are included by design. This means that some stuff, like embedding a debugger or an interpreter (yielding a sort of IDE),...

... While this in my opinion is a better approach, it does not create globals and does not answer the question asked. It's an alternative approach and I'd always encourage those, however the sheer bullish cocky-ness of statements like "This is the only correct answer on this thr...

...defensive programming - someday getters and setters may be helpful, and it doesn't cost a lot to create/use them. So they are sometimes useful. In practice, most fields have simple getters and setters. A possible solution would look like this: public property String foo; a->Foo = b->Foo;...

... This does not answer the title question: How to stop a JavaScript for loop? It does answer Is there a better way to return the index of a match/-1 if none. – greybeard Dec 1 '19 at 21:43 ...

... Correct me if I'm wrong, but this doesn't allow you to add any additional functionality though, correct? You're essentially only aliasing the console object? A crude example - there is no way to console.log() the event twice for every debug.log() ? ...

...like this answer because it shows what happens when the number of elements doesn't match up, similar to the msdn documentation – DLeh Sep 9 '14 at 19:05 ...