大约有 32,000 项符合查询结果（耗时：0.0263秒） [XML]
tag vs tag
...
answered Oct 21 '19 at 11:27
Mohsin SaeedMohsin Saeed
733 bronze badges
...
Performance of Find() vs. FirstOrDefault() [duplicate]
...dMilliseconds);
That runs about the same speed as the first one (25ms vs 27ms for FirstOrDefault)
EDIT: If I add an array loop, it gets pretty close to the Find() speed, and given @devshorts peek at the source code, I think this is it:
//4. System.Collections.Generic.List<T> for loop
var c...
“for” vs “each” in Ruby
...r answers.
– akuhn
Dec 23 '16 at 22:27
...
Scala list concatenation, ::: vs ++
...u003cpath fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M25.6622 17.6335C27.8049 17.6335 29.3739 16.9402 30.2537 15.6379C30.8468 14.7755 30.9615 13.5579 30.9615 11.9512V6.59049C30.9615 5.28821 30.4833 4.66231 29.4502 4.66231C28.9913 4.66231 28.4555 4.94978 28.1109 5.50789C27.499 4.86533 26.7335 4....
$_POST vs. $_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] == 'POST'
...
answered Jan 3 '09 at 17:27
gnudgnud
70.2k55 gold badges5454 silver badges7676 bronze badges
...
How to create an installer for a .net Windows Service using Visual Studio
...ormation.
– Christopher Painter
Jan 27 '12 at 11:51
9
@Christopher Painter I have been using the ...
string.charAt(x) or string[x]?
... |
edited Sep 1 '18 at 22:27
jdunning
65411 gold badge55 silver badges1818 bronze badges
answered May 10...
Forking vs. Branching in GitHub
...u003cpath fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M25.6622 17.6335C27.8049 17.6335 29.3739 16.9402 30.2537 15.6379C30.8468 14.7755 30.9615 13.5579 30.9615 11.9512V6.59049C30.9615 5.28821 30.4833 4.66231 29.4502 4.66231C28.9913 4.66231 28.4555 4.94978 28.1109 5.50789C27.499 4.86533 26.7335 4....
Visual Studio setup problem - 'A problem has been encountered while loading the setup components. Ca
...aving ~2gb physical memory free at the time) which has rendered my current VS install useless.
16 Answers
...
Is there a performance gain in using single quotes vs double quotes in ruby?
....120000 ( 0.116761)
concat single 0.280000 0.000000 0.280000 ( 0.276964)
concat double 0.270000 0.000000 0.270000 ( 0.278146)
Note: I've updated this to make it work with newer Ruby versions, and cleaned up the header, and run the benchmark on a faster system.
This answer omit...